Automobile Insurance: Will it apply equally for many different types of vehicles?

Jan 22, 2013
Categories: Ask Steve
Staebler blog logo
Default featured image

If it’s a licensed vehicle, it needs to have Auto insurance before taking it out on to the road, right?  Ontario’s Compulsory Automobile Insurance Act requires that all motor vehicles be insured under a policy of insurance when operated on public roads.  The Highway Traffic Act considers “any other vehicle propelled or driven otherwise than by muscular power” as a motor vehicle.

The Insurance Act looks at it a little differently.  We appreciate that all those typical automobiles; cars, pick-ups, SUVs, trailers, trucks, RVs, vans, etc., that we’ve seen on the roads for decades can be appropriately ‘covered’ under the standard Ontario Automobile Policy.

But an Ontario arbitrator found that someone driving a golf cart on the road – illegally – fit the definition, and was therefore recognized as vehicle for insurance purposes, triggering the Statutory Accident Benefits under an Automobile Insurance policy.  A similar finding in Manitoba resulted in the person injured in the golf cart being entitled to no-fault benefits.

This makes interpretation confusing.  In one case, a court judge ruled that a go-kart operated on a private track was an automobile for insurance purposes.  That ruling was later overturned, but it does illustrate how things are changing.  Definitions in automobile policies are not strict and facts can be manipulated to suit an outcome.  In B.C., licensing and insurance are required on golf carts in some situations including where they may be used around or on public highways /roads.  In B.C. the public parking lots of golf courses were classified as highways, until revised last spring.

To make things more confusing, the definitions in different legislation are changing.  A bicycle is now recognized as a “vehicle” under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act with respect to following the same ‘rules of the road’ as other vehicles.  Enter the e-bikes.  These are not required to be licensed, but are clearly picked up by the Highway Traffic Act.  Again, the Automobile Insurance Act defines these differently.  And when driverless-cars become popular; and they’ve already been tested and approved in California, we will have another set of issues.

From an insurance perspective, we need to recommend coverage for all your different ‘vehicles’.  Talk to your broker about it.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Cyber Liability: What’s at risk?

Cyber Liability: What’s at risk?

At a 2012 Cyber & Privacy Risk conference changes in cyber risk were noted: 1. Cyber attacks have become pervasive 2. current defensive systems aren't working, and 3. Cyber risk is getting bigger and broader. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)...

read more
Cyber Liability: What’s at risk?

Insurance Business Risks

Every day business owners face a number of liabilities, many of which can be insured with that well known Commercial General Liability (CGL) insurance policy.  But where are the 'gaps' and why are they there?  Can you do anything about them? Coverage limitations...

read more
Cyber Liability: What’s at risk?

Your Home & Auto Insurance could be at risk

Protect your Personal Insurance. You could be risking everything without knowing it. We all know that a thief can break into a car in a matter of seconds. Cars are been targeted at large events, like basketball or hockey games. And, we have all heard that having...

read more
Cyber Liability: What’s at risk?

What’s Co-Insurance & why should you care?

One of the most common clauses in any insurance policy is co-insurance. Who thought it up in the first place? Co-insurance goes back over 100 years, and is meant as a means to persuade people to buy insurance to the full value of their risk being insured. Let’s take...

read more